The Significance of Comprehending Ontology and Epistemology within the Framework of Practitioner Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jefr/2022.8359404Keywords:
Ontology, Epistemology, Research, Banking SectorAbstract
The point of this study is to give you something to think about when you think about how professors set the stage for their research by looking at identity and acculturation in educational institutions. The fact that this is done shows how important it is for researchers to align their philosophical views, epistemological views, and dataset collection and analysis methods. The goal of this study is to look into the different methods that are used to solve the problem of identity development, with a focus on exploring problems with ontological and epistemological knowledge. Some examples of these research methods can be found in three studies that the experts did in schools. Researchers can better think about and improve their projects if they have a deeper understanding of the fundamental substructures that affect their studies. In turn, this will allow them to participate in their projects in a more useful way.
References
Altugan, A. S. (2015). The relationship between cultural identity and learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1159–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.161
Bahari, S. F. (2012). Qualitative versus quantitative research strategies: Contrasting epistemological and ontological assumptions. Jurnal Teknologi. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v52.134
Boon, M., & Van Baalen, S. (2018). Epistemology for interdisciplinary research – shifting philosophical paradigms of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4
Darling‐Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C. M., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Ejnavarzala, H. (2019). Epistemology–Ontology Relations in Social Research: A Review. Sociological Bulletin, 68(1), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022918819369
Gillborn, D. (2006). Critical Race Theory and Education: Racism and anti-racism in educational theory and praxis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300500510229
Guala, F., & Hindriks, F. (2022). The nature and significance of social ontology. Synthese, 201(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04142-1
Hedges, L. V., & Schauer, J. (2018). Randomised trials in education in the USA. Educational Research, 60(3), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1493350
Kooli, C. (2022). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614
Oh, C. J., & Kim, N. Y. (2016). “Success Is Relative”: Comparative Social Class and Ethnic Effects in an Academic Paradox. Sociological Perspectives, 59(2), 270–295. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26339113
Padilla, A. M., & Pérez, W. (2003). Acculturation, Social Identity, and Social Cognition: A New Perspective. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303251694
Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2022). Personal Values Across Cultures. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 517–546. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-125100
Sol, K., & Heng, K. (2022). Understanding epistemology and its key approaches in research. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.62037/cjer.2022.02.02.05
Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., & Andriukaitienė, R. (2018). Philosophy and paradigm of scientific research. In InTech eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70628
